GPU baseline
SGLang / vLLM on GPUs
~100tok/s
Unchecked output
An infra-first test-time scaling company
Low-latency infrastructure for deeper reasoning and verification.
Talk to usOur vision
Deep, recursive workflows have to finish in practical time.
Low-latency execution has to stay affordable at scale.
Results from very long reasoning traces have to be checked.
SGLang / vLLM on GPUs
~100tok/s
Unchecked output
optimised inference on GPUs
~1,000tok/s
Verified output
Cerebras wafer with GPUs
~5,000tok/s
Verified output
0 s1 s · deadline
GPU system1× speed
one attempt
ChronoFoundryup to 10× speed
a checked answer
More reasoning steps fit inside the same deadline.
Sample several candidates and keep the best one.
Leave time to check the answer before it ships.
One portable stack, on Cerebras since 2021 and now on Tenstorrent and AMD GPUs. A new model in 7 days instead of 3 months; new hardware in a month instead of a year.
2–4×
lower latency than SGLang / vLLM
On B300 GPU servers
6–10×
lower latency than GPU systems
On Cerebras
Each part of a workload runs on the chip that suits it best, scheduled by AI.
State-of-the-art GPU
1×
baseline interactivity
+ WSE-3
6×
relative interactivity
+ WSE-3 Turbo
10×
relative interactivity
Verification keeps pace with generation, from the outputs to the reasoning itself.
| Execution engines | Inference platforms | Heterogeneous compute | ChronoFoundry | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core question | Run models faster | Deliver inference at scale | Match workloads to hardware | How much useful compute, and is the result good enough? |
| Focus | Kernels, runtimes | API, capacity | Orchestration | Low-latency execution, search, verification |
Infrastructure partners
Spending more compute while a model works on a problem, to reason longer, try alternatives and verify results, without retraining it.
No. We build the infrastructure that runs models faster and checks their results.
Cerebras, Tenstorrent, and NVIDIA and AMD GPUs. Support for more is planned.
Inference providers sell tokens. We focus on how much useful compute a task gets and whether its result can be trusted.
Yes, as an infrastructure partner. Compatibility is confirmed in a technical assessment.
No. They come from specific benchmarks and setups. Results vary by model, hardware and workload.
ChronoFoundryInfrastructure for test-time scaling.